Минералните права -права на хумосния собственик

[LANDLORD 31]

Аз си помислих, че ме подкрепяш само трезван...Като се напиеш, започваш да ме хулиш....

Е, да де, нали и аз това казвам. Като се напия, ТИ се променяш Помислих си, че и е..еш с моя кр

[4i40]

Подкрепям те напълно докато още не съм се напил, щото онзи дето е написал постинг след теб ще го препечата 100 пъти

Аз си помислих, че ме подкрепяш само трезван...Като се напиеш, започваш да ме хулиш....

[LANDLORD 31]

Темата е за " в киреча".....

Подкрепям те напълно докато още не съм се напил, щото онзи дето е написал постинг след теб ще го препечата 100 пъти

[agronoma1]

Призовавам всички собственници на земя да изискат чрез законосъобразни средства промяна на закона. С цел придобиване на собственност на полезните изкопаеми находящи се в собственноста им

[4i40]

Темата е за " в киреча".....

[Pyramid]

Apart from our current minerals portfolio, we hold the mineral rights to various areas, covering some 80 manors, largely in north Wales.

This title is of a historic nature and in most cases derives from reservations to the Crown under the Inclosure Awards and Acts of the early 19th century.

Because of its historic nature, most of this title had not previously been registered and was protected as an 'over-riding interest'. However, under the Land Registration Act 2002, this protection is removed from October 2013, and owners of mineral rights which are 'manorial' are obliged to register their mineral interest if it is to be protected beyond this statutory deadline. Consequently, The Crown Estate along with many other land owners, are embarking upon a programme to register their existing mineral rights.

The process includes an application to The Land Registry to register the minerals providing evidence of title. The Land Registry, which is a separate and distinct organisation from The Crown Estate, will write to the surface title owner to inform them of the application.

We recognise that surface owners may not realise that they don't own the mineral rights beneath their property, and the notice may come as a surprise. If you have received such a notice from the Land Registry, you may have some questions, so we have provided some answers to those questions we have received to date.
Q&A

Why are you registering these mineral rights?

Until now, our unregistered manorial mineral rights have been automatically protected, but the Land Registration Act 2002 means that we must register those rights with the Land Registry before October 2013 or risk losing them.

Why did I hear from the Land Registry and not from The Crown Estate?

The process of registering any property or rights is controlled by the Land Registry and The Crown Estate must abide by that process. We make an application to them and they contact the surface owners. We do not know the names and addresses of surface owners so we are not able to contact them beforehand.

Is this a new claim for mineral rights?

No. We have owned these minerals for many centuries. Under the Inclosure Awards of the early 19th century, the surface titles were allotted to various parties. These surface titles have been sold subsequently and are now vested in the current owners. Under the Inclosure Acts, which governed the awards, the Crown retained the rights to the minerals.

Why don't my current title deeds show that you own the minerals under my property?

The titles of many surface owners show that their ownership specifically excludes minerals, although it might not show who owns them. Other titles have not picked up on this exclusion as it may have been omitted over the many transactions and changes of ownership over the centuries. However this does not change the fact that the minerals still belong to the Crown.

Can I challenge the registration of minerals?

Yes. The notice from the Land Registry tells you how to do this, and if you do, the Land Registry will be the arbiter of who is the owner. To challenge the registration, you must provide evidence that you have title to the mineral rights. If you choose to do this, we would always recommend that you seek legal advice.

Why are you doing this now? Does it mean you intend to start mining?

No. The rights are being registered now because of the legal deadline. The vast majority of our rights have been held for centuries without any minerals being extracted, and it is probable that most will never be mined. The Crown Estate must take a long view far beyond the current situation and current surface ownership and it has an obligation under the Crown Estate Act 1961 to protect its assets and rights, so this is not something we can simply give away.

If you register these rights, can you start mining my property without my permission?

No. This registration does not indicate intent to mine. We do not hold compulsory powers to purchase surface land, and any mining activity would require permission of the surface owners, planning permission and so on.

Will this affect the value of my property or make it harder to sell or mortgage?

The mineral rights have always been owned by The Crown Estate so there is no change in ownership, just that these rights will now be registered. We cannot guarantee the value of your property but the current Council of Mortgage Lenders guidelines do not consider the reservation of minerals to be a significant matter. As such, we cannot see no reason why this would have any impact on value or marketability.

Will this affect my buildings insurance?

Underwriting policies are the responsibility of the insurer but our view is that because there is no intention to undertake mining activity there would be no effect on your ability to obtain insurance.

Can I buy the mineral rights beneath my property from you?

We are not registering the mineral rights in order to derive an income from selling them. At the moment we have no plans to sell any of these rights.

How do I get a copy of your registration application and evidence of title?

The notice from the Land Registry tells you how to obtain these from them. You must approach them and not The Crown Estate.

Do these rights include coal?

No. Following the privatisation of the coal industry, the ownership of all coal now resides with the Coal Authority which assumed responsibility for unworked coal and liabilities for past coal mining in 1994.

Do these rights include oil and gas?

No. Ownership of oil and gas within the land area of Great Britain was vested in the Crown by the Petroleum (Production) Act 1934. The 'Crown' in this context is not The Crown Estate which has no ownership or role in licensing. For landward oil and gas exploration, a licence is required from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, but these licences do not include any rights of access to surface land. The Crown Estate does not engage in oil and gas exploration or production.

Do these rights include gold and silver?

No. However, the rights to gold and silver, known as 'Mines Royal', are owned separately by The Crown Estate across the whole of the UK, except some parts of Scotland.

Does The Crown Estate intend to use these minerals rights to undertake 'fracking'?

The Crown Estate has no role in Shale Gas extraction and in this is no different from any landowner in the UK. Under the Petroleum Act 1998, rights to the extraction of shale gas are vested in Her Majesty in right of the Crown. However, The Crown Estate has no role in administering these rights. This is the responsibility of HM Government and more specifically the Department for Energy and Climate Change, which exclusively licenses and permits shale gas extraction nationwide, even in relation to land forming part of The Crown Estate.

Сега, в една тема, злополучно заключена от модераторите приде няколко часа, се повдигна въпросът на какъв език са постовете. Цитат-ясно, а ТВОЯТ коментар?
Слагам целия "цитат" тук, за да не може /някой/ да си "поправи" поста и да излезе, че си измислям за четящите по-късно.


Предлагам "просто цитати" да не се броят за коментар. Защото, в цитата не виждам думите на /уж/ коментиращия по темата а...
...а уж сме се събрали НИЕ да коментираме.

[agronoma1]

Manorial minerals

Apart from our current minerals portfolio, we hold the mineral rights to various areas, covering some 80 manors, largely in north Wales.

This title is of a historic nature and in most cases derives from reservations to the Crown under the Inclosure Awards and Acts of the early 19th century.

Because of its historic nature, most of this title had not previously been registered and was protected as an 'over-riding interest'. However, under the Land Registration Act 2002, this protection is removed from October 2013, and owners of mineral rights which are 'manorial' are obliged to register their mineral interest if it is to be protected beyond this statutory deadline. Consequently, The Crown Estate along with many other land owners, are embarking upon a programme to register their existing mineral rights.

The process includes an application to The Land Registry to register the minerals providing evidence of title. The Land Registry, which is a separate and distinct organisation from The Crown Estate, will write to the surface title owner to inform them of the application.

We recognise that surface owners may not realise that they don't own the mineral rights beneath their property, and the notice may come as a surprise. If you have received such a notice from the Land Registry, you may have some questions, so we have provided some answers to those questions we have received to date.
Q&A

Why are you registering these mineral rights?

Until now, our unregistered manorial mineral rights have been automatically protected, but the Land Registration Act 2002 means that we must register those rights with the Land Registry before October 2013 or risk losing them.

Why did I hear from the Land Registry and not from The Crown Estate?

The process of registering any property or rights is controlled by the Land Registry and The Crown Estate must abide by that process. We make an application to them and they contact the surface owners. We do not know the names and addresses of surface owners so we are not able to contact them beforehand.

Is this a new claim for mineral rights?

No. We have owned these minerals for many centuries. Under the Inclosure Awards of the early 19th century, the surface titles were allotted to various parties. These surface titles have been sold subsequently and are now vested in the current owners. Under the Inclosure Acts, which governed the awards, the Crown retained the rights to the minerals.

Why don't my current title deeds show that you own the minerals under my property?

The titles of many surface owners show that their ownership specifically excludes minerals, although it might not show who owns them. Other titles have not picked up on this exclusion as it may have been omitted over the many transactions and changes of ownership over the centuries. However this does not change the fact that the minerals still belong to the Crown.

Can I challenge the registration of minerals?

Yes. The notice from the Land Registry tells you how to do this, and if you do, the Land Registry will be the arbiter of who is the owner. To challenge the registration, you must provide evidence that you have title to the mineral rights. If you choose to do this, we would always recommend that you seek legal advice.

Why are you doing this now? Does it mean you intend to start mining?

No. The rights are being registered now because of the legal deadline. The vast majority of our rights have been held for centuries without any minerals being extracted, and it is probable that most will never be mined. The Crown Estate must take a long view far beyond the current situation and current surface ownership and it has an obligation under the Crown Estate Act 1961 to protect its assets and rights, so this is not something we can simply give away.

If you register these rights, can you start mining my property without my permission?

No. This registration does not indicate intent to mine. We do not hold compulsory powers to purchase surface land, and any mining activity would require permission of the surface owners, planning permission and so on.

Will this affect the value of my property or make it harder to sell or mortgage?

The mineral rights have always been owned by The Crown Estate so there is no change in ownership, just that these rights will now be registered. We cannot guarantee the value of your property but the current Council of Mortgage Lenders guidelines do not consider the reservation of minerals to be a significant matter. As such, we cannot see no reason why this would have any impact on value or marketability.

Will this affect my buildings insurance?

Underwriting policies are the responsibility of the insurer but our view is that because there is no intention to undertake mining activity there would be no effect on your ability to obtain insurance.

Can I buy the mineral rights beneath my property from you?

We are not registering the mineral rights in order to derive an income from selling them. At the moment we have no plans to sell any of these rights.

How do I get a copy of your registration application and evidence of title?

The notice from the Land Registry tells you how to obtain these from them. You must approach them and not The Crown Estate.

Do these rights include coal?

No. Following the privatisation of the coal industry, the ownership of all coal now resides with the Coal Authority which assumed responsibility for unworked coal and liabilities for past coal mining in 1994.

Do these rights include oil and gas?

No. Ownership of oil and gas within the land area of Great Britain was vested in the Crown by the Petroleum (Production) Act 1934. The 'Crown' in this context is not The Crown Estate which has no ownership or role in licensing. For landward oil and gas exploration, a licence is required from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, but these licences do not include any rights of access to surface land. The Crown Estate does not engage in oil and gas exploration or production.

Do these rights include gold and silver?

No. However, the rights to gold and silver, known as 'Mines Royal', are owned separately by The Crown Estate across the whole of the UK, except some parts of Scotland.

Does The Crown Estate intend to use these minerals rights to undertake 'fracking'?

The Crown Estate has no role in Shale Gas extraction and in this is no different from any landowner in the UK. Under the Petroleum Act 1998, rights to the extraction of shale gas are vested in Her Majesty in right of the Crown. However, The Crown Estate has no role in administering these rights. This is the responsibility of HM Government and more specifically the Department for Energy and Climate Change, which exclusively licenses and permits shale gas extraction nationwide, even in relation to land forming part of The Crown Estate.

[Pyramid]

Пък викаш българите преди сто години, като са ядяли само стари сортове и никакви домати и картофи, са имали приказката "40 годишна старица". Толкова здрави и дълголетни са били.

Тогава светът не е бил замърсен в такава степен като цяло но, е нямало и подобно познание, нито здравеопазване, нито почти нищо от това, което познаваме днес.

Тогава, обаче, са живели нашите прадеди, повече от които /като процент/ са достигнали до преклонната възраст 90-100+ години.

А Агрономският се вихри, т.к. нещо е разочарован. Адмирации, прочее, за бойния му дух...

[tea_cup]

Казвам че първичните неселектирани местни сортове произведени с биометоди и косумирани от местно население са здравословни.
Ако първичните неселектирани местни сортове произведени с биометоди се консумират от неместни човеци НЕ СА ЗДРАВОСЛОВНИ
ЗА съжаление неселектираните сортове, обикновенно са ниско добивни

Пък викаш българите преди сто години, като са ядяли само стари сортове и никакви домати и картофи, са имали приказката "40 годишна старица". Толкова здрави и дълголетни са били.

[Pyramid]

В САЩ минералните права са в собственност на собственника на земя.

В Англия с изключение на нефт, газ, въглища, злато и сребро, минералните права са в собственност на собственника на земя.

Тоест, в Англия, освен така желаните от теб...

А по селектираните и неселектирани сортове...и "неселектираните" СА селектирани. Просто, минали са естествен отбор /селекция/ . А с какво, освен с ясни параметри и гарантирани показатели са по-лоши изкуствено подбираните?

[agronoma1]

В САЩ минералните права са в собственност на собственника на земя.

В Англия с изключение на нефт, газ, въглища, злато и сребро, минералните права са в собственност на собственника на земя.

[agronoma1]

Необосновано твърдение е онова, дето уж слабопродуктивните сортове /само/ били "безвредни" защото били "местни". Ами, ако те/примерно/ усвояват повече тежки метали? Ами ако те, примерно, са по-непродуктивни, т.к. са по-пълни с "фибри" /т.е., чиста целулоза/ за разлика от сортове, които дават повече захари, витамини, микроелементи? Да питам и тук, ако някой е пропуснал по-предни запитвания: От това, примерно, че комшията ти не става следва ли, автоматично, че ти ставаш?
- И с плод-зеленчука е същото. Вярвай ако щеш, Агрономски.

Казвам че първичните неселектирани местни сортове произведени с биометоди и косумирани от местно население са здравословни.
Ако първичните неселектирани местни сортове произведени с биометоди се консумират от неместни човеци НЕ СА ЗДРАВОСЛОВНИ
ЗА съжаление неселектираните сортове, обикновенно са ниско добивни

[agronoma1]

Ми освен да ядем бакла и лимец, друго не виждам. Тук сме само от 1300 години, даже с гроздето не трябва да сме ОК. Да не говорим за това кафе, домати, картофи, чай.

така е.ромите за това са краткосрочно на белия свят.ензимни проблеми

[tea_cup]

човешките ензими са адаптирали с хилядолетия към МЕСТНИТЕ растителни видове.
хорта трябва да консумират храна от раяйона в които живеят от хилядолетия.
Биопродуктите от друг часови пояс не са здравословни, ензимите ни се объркват и си произвеждаме токсини в тялото.

Ми освен да ядем бакла и лимец, друго не виждам. Тук сме само от 1300 години, даже с гроздето не трябва да сме ОК. Да не говорим за това кафе, домати, картофи, чай.

[Pyramid]

Необосновано твърдение е онова, дето уж слабопродуктивните сортове /само/ били "безвредни" защото били "местни". Ами, ако те/примерно/ усвояват повече тежки метали? Ами ако те, примерно, са по-непродуктивни, т.к. са по-пълни с "фибри" /т.е., чиста целулоза/ за разлика от сортове, които дават повече захари, витамини, микроелементи? Да питам и тук, ако някой е пропуснал по-предни запитвания: От това, примерно, че комшията ти не става следва ли, автоматично, че ти ставаш?
- И с плод-зеленчука е същото. Вярвай ако щеш, Агрономски.