Батао Сяо и другият Сяо не са на място, а в Пекин. Като доказателство посочват само някаква карта.
Тези, които са на място в лабораторията казват, че никой от тях не е бил заразяван.
A new paper from the Beijing-sponsored South China University of Technology casts doubt on the government’s theory that the deadly infection emerged at a seafood market in Wuhan. Scholars Botao Xiao and Lei Xiao said the city’s Centre for Disease Control, just 300 yards away from the market, ‘hosted animals in laboratories for research purposes’, including 605 bats. Their paper titled ‘The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus’ claims that bats once attacked a researcher and ‘blood of bat was on his skin.’ It says he quarantined himself for a total of 28 days after bats also urinated on him. The paper, which only gave maps as evidence of their theory, said that genome sequences from patients with coronavirus were between 89% and 96% identical to the coronavirus originally found in the horseshoe bat.
Adding weight to their theory, Botao and Lei said testimonies from 31 residents and 28 visitors to Wuhan suggested bats were never traded at the market or consumed locally. The scholars said that the closest native bats to Wuhan were around 600 miles away and that the probability of them flying that far was minimal. The paper said: ‘The killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan.’ And as well as the Wuhan Health Centre for Disease Control (WHCDC), the report suggests that the Wuhan Institute of Virology could also have leaked the virus.

Тези, които са на място в лабораторията казват, че никой от тях не е бил заразяван.
A new paper from the Beijing-sponsored South China University of Technology casts doubt on the government’s theory that the deadly infection emerged at a seafood market in Wuhan. Scholars Botao Xiao and Lei Xiao said the city’s Centre for Disease Control, just 300 yards away from the market, ‘hosted animals in laboratories for research purposes’, including 605 bats. Their paper titled ‘The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus’ claims that bats once attacked a researcher and ‘blood of bat was on his skin.’ It says he quarantined himself for a total of 28 days after bats also urinated on him. The paper, which only gave maps as evidence of their theory, said that genome sequences from patients with coronavirus were between 89% and 96% identical to the coronavirus originally found in the horseshoe bat.
Adding weight to their theory, Botao and Lei said testimonies from 31 residents and 28 visitors to Wuhan suggested bats were never traded at the market or consumed locally. The scholars said that the closest native bats to Wuhan were around 600 miles away and that the probability of them flying that far was minimal. The paper said: ‘The killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan.’ And as well as the Wuhan Health Centre for Disease Control (WHCDC), the report suggests that the Wuhan Institute of Virology could also have leaked the virus.
Първоначално изпратено от LaCosta
Разгледай мнение
Коментар